Products

Unique Selling Point (USP) of the WWFM-DSAP Producs & Protocol

The diatomic product series and the connectivity process of the protocol hosted on these products, are both mathematical fractals operating in unison. This creates a ‘Russian-doll’ effect – whereby the hardware’s physical size, signal range and other attributes step down in unison scale, with the protocol’s ‘bloculus‘ feature (Uber H3 Resolutions).

This fractal/ Russian-doll pattern in the scaling of the hardware and protocol, creates a telescoping effect in both, which results in WWFM-DSAP stations autonomously connecting to one another in the most efficient way possible at every one of its OSI Layers. Not just forming a mesh network, but a mesh internet which is near impossible to censor, regulate or centralized maybe even hack – such is the case with the architecture of web 2.0 internet.

WWFM-DSAP referes to its OSI Layers and not the OSI Layers as WWFM-DSAP does not follow the OSI Layers verbatim, since the OSI Layers are centralized in nature. Instead WWFM-DSAP Layer 1 is mesh, not a centralized ISP (which this website clearly establishes). Layer 2 is Blockchain/ DHT-based MAC address assignment e.g. no centralized registry such as IEEE’s MAC address registry. And the list goes on as illustrated in the following table:

OSI Layer	WWFM-DSAP’s Decentralized Alternative	Traditional Centralization Solutions
Physical Layer	Mesh networks with peer-to-peer communication, utilizing low-power, decentralized radios	Centralized cellular or Wi-Fi networks with fixed base stations that manage device connections and signal routing.
Data Link Layer	Blockchain or DHT-based MAC address assignment (no centralized registry for MAC addresses)	IEEE 802 MAC addresses assigned by centralized registries, ensuring globally unique identifiers, which require central authority for assignment and management.
Network Layer	Decentralized routing protocols (e.g., using blockchain-based routing tables or DHTs)	IP routing managed by centralized ISPs and routers, with centralized control over IP address allocation (e.g., via DHCP servers) and route management by ISPs and networks.
Transport Layer	Peer-to-peer protocols for end-to-end communication (e.g., decentralized WebRTC)	Centralized transport protocols like TCP/UDP rely on central servers to maintain session state and route data.
Session Layer	Decentralized session management (e.g., using distributed ledger for state tracking)	Centralized session control via servers like those used in web applications (e.g., databases managing session state).
Presentation Layer	End-to-end encrypted, decentralized data encoding and compression (e.g., using P2P file sharing for encoding/decoding data)	Traditional encryption handled by centralized certificate authorities and encryption services, relying on centralized key management systems.
Application Layer	Decentralized applications (e.g., P2P apps, smart contracts on blockchain platforms)	Conventional web services and apps rely on centralized servers to host and manage user data, authentication, and application logic, creating single points of control.

This rapid triangulation process can be visualized as a descent through the eye of a digital tornado, precisely targeting neighboring access points to establish a fully autonomous mesh network.

It’s widely acknowledged that varying population densities necessitate different hardware solutions for connectivity. For instance, expansive areas require at least one satellite or cell tower to achieve the most cost-effective and energy-efficient connectivity. Conversely, highly populated venues (such as sports stadiums) demand multiple access points to effectively manage user traffic and ensure reliable service.

WWFM learns from older free internet orgs which have failed to deliver a free-to-access internet. Our primary difference in our approach begins by working bottom-up instead of top-down. What we mean by this is that instead of flying drones or balloons or launching satellites, WWFM’s licenced Integrator Alliance operators and their local partners will supply communities with free software and guides so that anyone, anywhere can upcycle and re-purpose pre-existing hardware. Now an old smartphone with a broken screen can become a WWFM “home-hub” home-server. These WWFM stations are also hybrid, in that they don’t infringe on the terms of service the end-user has with their existing ISP. One key strategy of WWFM of networking together administrative divisions within the next level up’s administrative division is by making the hardware running the WWFM protocol and subsequent network – smaller, cheaper and more ubiquitous.

Until family, friends or colleagues are connected with the WWFM protocol (and the benefits of WWFM become more obvious), people can’t be expected to care about linking their local WWFM network to a neighbouring one to forge WWFM network for the administrative division theirs belongs within.

WWFM-DSAP represents a sovereign and ubiquitous network, akin to particles of nitrogen in the air—omnipresent and freely accessible. In this model, connectivity is inherent, seamless, and integrated into the environment, allowing users to interact and exchange information effortlessly. In contrast, the traditional internet, facilitated by ISP’s, is like putting air in a bag and charging people to breathe. This model restricts access and imposes a fee on communicating digitally, creating yet another barrier to connectivity. Users are required to pay for access to the digital realm, which stands in stark opposition to the inherent freedom and accessibility of WWFM and even the original internet protocol.

There’d need to be three initial scales of hardware products as illustrated below: (1) ‘Diatomic Dome’s’: for the center of a community e.g. condominiums/ HOA’s, campuses, neighbourhoods etc. (2) Are the ‘Diatomic (Exterior) Walls’ which are for the exterior of a property and (3) are the interior of a home e.g. ‘Diatomic Home Hub’.